Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954)- Jack Arnold

 ★★★★

 

Deep beneath the surface, hidden from the world for who knows how long, lurks the Gil-man.Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954) He sits, waiting for the human race to come close enough to exact his revenge for… wait a minute, why is the Gil-man killing everyone? Oh, well. Whatever the reason may be, the humans have come at last, and Gil-man is angry. At first he just kills whatever he can get his webbed hands around, mercilessly destroying all the men that cross his path, but then he sees Kay (Julie Adams) swimming seductively in his lagoon. She leaves him speechless (which he was anyway), as he is enamored by her beauty, and of course by her swimming ability. The callous, slimy exterior that covers his body might be how everyone sees him, but inside he just Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954)wants to be loved by the only woman he has ever seen, whose has forever captured his heart.

Unfortunately Kay wants nothing to do with Gil-man, and would prefer to marry her fellow scientist, Dr. Reed (Richard Carlson), who is on this expedition as well. And wouldn’t you know it, her boss Mark (Richard Denning), who is also along for the ride, is vying for her affections as well. Apparently, everyone in this movie is just trying to win Kay’s heart. Who will she choose, the cocky, arrogant boss, the loving, yet non-committing boyfriend, or perhaps the incredibly good swimming and seemingly devoted Gil-man? Only time will tell!

O.K., I know that’s laying it on pretty thick, but come on, a movie this fun does things to you.

Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954)

The thin, easily forgettable plot of “Creature from the Black Lagoon” (1954) is dumb and uninvolved; but that’s alright. Nobody cares because nobody watches this film for the story anyway. Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954)In fact, I applaud director Jack Arnold for not trying to give the film too much of anything except Gil-man. We get Gil-man swimming, Gil-man killing, Gil-man walking incredibly slowly, and of course, Gil-man lusting over Kay. That’s it, the whole package right there, Gil-man and Kay, and it couldn’t be any better. At first I was slightly irritated that there wasn’t more going on in this film. Couldn’t the Creature have had some reason for his actions? Perhaps by coming into his Lagoon, they were trespassing on sacred ground or something. Then it occurred to me that any kind of motivation for the senseless killing would have made Gil-man less terrifying. A movie killer with a purpose is exacting, regimented, and beatable because his moves can be predicted, but a monster that kills just because is almost unstoppable.

Ben Chapman plays the Creature on land, and Ricou Browning does the underwater scenes, both of them achieving a perfect combination of terrifying and pitiful. What they had to endure, with 14 hour days, limited visibility, and not being able to sit in their suit, is a true testament to their dedication to a character. Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954)Especially since their faces are never seen of film. The costume itself is remarkable, the underwater scenes are stunningly filmed, and just in case the movie needed another selling point, it makes great use of 3D, considering when it was released. I am not typically a huge supporter of the 3D medium, but I think “Creature from the Black Lagoon” is perfectly suited for the extra enjoyment that it provides here.

Advertisements

0 thoughts on “Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954)- Jack Arnold

  1. Rick says:

    I recently had the honor to interview Julie Adams, who recalls the making of this film fondly. I am always surprised by the sexual undercurrent, especially in scenes like the one where the Gill Man swims under Julie swimming on the lagoon surface. The sequels weren’t as good, but still worth a look.

    Like

    • Paul says:

      What a thrill to interview her, and what a unique experience she had. I agree about both the sexual undercurrent and the sequels. The sexuality of this film is undeniable which might seem weird, but is really nothing compared to “King Kong” right?

      Like

  2. R.A. Kerr says:

    I love, absolutely love, this film, and your review has done it justice.

    I first saw this at a midnight showing at an arthouse theatre – the audience loved every moment of it. It was a mostly younger crowd, which surprised me, and they “got” what the movie was supposed to be. It was a wonderful experience.

    Like

    • Paul says:

      I have the feeling younger audiences typically get these kinds of films today. When watching an older film that tends to look and feel dated (especially with effects or costumes), you can either write it off, or enjoy the “fun” feeling that the filmmakers obviously tried to present. I tend to enjoy these types of movies, even with their dated flaws because I see (and appreciate) the effort that was put into the production.
      I’ve heard talk of a reboot in the Gil-Man franchise, but think that I will stick with this version. It’s just too much fun to ignore.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s